In accordance with Article 72 of Law 6 of 2014 concerning Rural Areas, village income sourced from the APBN or village funds comes from central spending by increasing the efficiency and equity of village programs. The amount of the budget allocation that is allocated directly to the village is set at 10%. the amount paid to the area (above). In addition, Law Number 6 of 2014 also strengthens the allocation of village funds (ADD) from district/city balancing funds. Given the enormous power of the village head in administering village government based on the Decree of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Number 72 of 2005 Article 14, it is necessary to review and balance the administration of village governance. The agency authorized to supervise village heads on village household expenditures is the BPD. The role of the village council as the controlling body of the village government requires responsibility and ability in carrying out its duties. It is also clear that according to the Decree of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Number 72 of 2005, the BPD is an institution that embodies democracy under the leadership of the village government as part of the village administration with the village head.

One of the Bank's services is the launch of an ATM card (Automated Teller Machine). Literally ATM can be interpreted as an automatic cash register or often called an Automated Teller Machine which means an automatic cash register without a person, placed inside or outside the bank's yard that can issue cash and handle routine banking transactions, such as depositing, withdrawing money, transfer between accounts, settlement or payment of credit card bills. However, at this time many ATM facilities provided by the Bank have been misused by criminals to commit crimes, one of which is the wedge trick mode, this wedge trick is an ATM card entered by a customer who is inserted into this ATM can enter but will be difficult to get out. as if the ATM card was swallowed by the machine even though it was only stuck, this crime with the jamming mode can be classified as a criminal act of theft by violating the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code. The problem approach in this study uses a normative approach, which is done by approaching the problem from a legal perspective, discussing and then reviewing books, statutory provisions and those related to the problems to be discussed. The results of the study concluded that efforts to overcome the crime of theft of the Automated Teller Machine (ATM) block mode by the West Lampung Police are through penal efforts (criminal law) and non-penal efforts (not / outside of criminal law), in addition to efforts made by the Police West Lampung in this response is carried out by increasing the activity of raids, patrols and guarding, but only when a crime occurs, does not involve the surrounding community and parties from the Bank and there is no cooperation with other parties and the West Lampung Police officers are inconsistent in carrying out operations/patrols. to prevent the most likely crime of theft by breaking into Automated Teller Machines (ATM). The inhibiting factors are internal factors and external factors, where internal factors include law enforcement itself. The imbalance of the rules used makes these crimes still increase from year to year. External factors include the lack of care and awareness from the public who do not report to the police. In addition to other inhibiting factors, namely the law that regulates it, law enforcement officers and legal culture factors.

Indonesia is a country based on law (rechtsstaat). This has a legal consequence that in the Indonesian state, the implementation of state power in a broad sense must and must always be based on law, because that law gives legitimacy as well as provides boundaries that are the authority of the state (government). A suspect who is detained and whose rights are violated can use legal instruments in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations in order to obtain legal certainty and a sense of justice for himself, especially in the protection and implementation of the rights of a detained suspect. The spread of the Covid-19 virus (Corona Virus Disease 2019) which occurred from the beginning of 2020 until now has had a major impact on the Correctional Persons, hereinafter referred to as WBP, in the Class II B State Detention Center in Kotabumi. So the question arises, How are the rights of prisoners in the Class II B State Detention Center in Kotabumi implemented? What efforts can be made by detainees if the implementation of prisoners' rights at the Class II B Kotabumi State Detention Center is not in accordance with the laws and regulations? The approach method used by the author in this study is a mixed approach, namely normative and empirical. The normative approach is the approach that the author obtained through books and laws and regulations, both those regulated in the Act, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code and other regulations related to the writing of this thesis. The empirical approach is the approach that the author obtained through the interview process and collecting information through the State Detention Center Class II B Kotabumi. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that the rights of WBP prisoners and temporary detainees have been well fulfilled, such as in the case of the program to reduce prison terms during the Covid-19 pandemic, which has been fulfilled in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. However, it would be better if the correctional officers paid more attention to the rights of prisoners related to the prevention of the Covid-19 virus in accordance with government recommendations and applicable government regulations. Considering that there are quite a number of WBP in the Class II B State Detention Center in Kotabumi, so there is a need for additional guidance by supervisory officers for prisoners properly and effectively. The lack of guidance in the detention center occurs because of obstacles, one of which is seen from external factors, namely in the form of a lack of coaching funds, coaching staff, and facilities and infrastructure. So, it would be nice if the existing obstacles can be met so that the coaching can run well.

Tipiring menurut ketentuan KUHP merupakan perbuatan pidana yang dikatagorikan sebagai perbuatan yang tidak berbahaya yaitu perbuatan pidana yang ancaman hukumannya paling lama  3 (tiga) bulan atau denda sebesar Rp. 7.500 (tujuh ribu lima ratus rupiah). Kasus tipiring ini umumnya diselesaikan dengan mengunakan pendekatan restoratif justice di tingkat Kepolisian. Namun pendekatan restorative justice terkadang dinilai kurang memenuhi rasa keadilan, baik korban, keluarga korban dan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu Mahkamah Agung Indonesia mengeluarkan peraturan yang bekenaaan dengan masalah tersebut yaitu Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda Dalam KUHP. Untuk membatasi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini diperlukan tujuan pendekatan masalah, tujuannya agar penelitian ini semakin terarah dan memudahkan penulis dalam membahasnya. Penelitian ini  menggunakan metode secara normatif, dan metode secara empiris. Keseluruhan yang telah diperoleh dianalisis kembali secara diskriptif kualitatif, diklasifikasikan dan dipisahkan sesuai dengan pokok permasalahannya sehingga dapat ditarik seuatu kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan implementasi hukuman terhadap pelaku tipiring dalam perkara No. 2/Pid.C/2020/PN Kbu bahwa dalam perkara tindak pidana ringan ini pelaksanaan putusannya dilakukan pada hari itu juga hal ini berlaku untuk semua tindak pidana ringan contohnya perkara lalu lintas hal ini untuk menghindari jangan sampai banyaknya kasus yang menumpuk di pengadilan dan putusan perkara ini cukup dicatat dibuku register lalu ditandatangi panitera dan hakim yang memimpin sidang tersebut.